Tuesday, 5 May 2026

Pixel Fold in 2026

There have been a couple of original-generation Pixel Fold units kicking about between various members of our Phones Show Chat community since it was launched in 2023. I've ended up with the second one now, Obsidian (black) with 256GB of storage. My SIM card often ends up inside it, and each time it does, I wonder why it ever got taken out!

The buzz for 2026, though, is that it's coming back with signs that Samsung is considering the 'wide' folding phone - and possibly even Apple too, later this year. Back in 2023, Google got it right, it seems, with this form factor. Everyone else ignored them, ending up with Google abandoning the idea and following the herd with the taller, squarer (when open) format that most others were churning out.

The original Pixel Fold is different - more like something Huawei is tinkering with in amongst its Pura line of devices. It's often dubbed the 'passport' size as it resembles just that - the standard size of a passport. Open yours up and see. When open, it's 'landscape', so wider than it is tall. Other 'book-style' folding phones are not like that at all - they are more like a square when open. And when closed, again, it has a ratio like a passport - wider than the average monoblock phone (and other book-style folding phones) and less tall.

Stubby, I guess, is the word. One-handed use is terrific, as I can certainly reach any part of the screen - even the far corners - and because it's wider, the keyboard is wider too, making for a much more comfortable typing experience even before you open it up. When you do open it up, you're presented with a working space that is much more like a computer monitor, tablet or TV screen - so consuming media and surfing webpages is easy-peasy and familiar to the brain. And there is the advantage, for those who want or need it, of opening up two apps side-by-side without either feeling cramped (or any worse than a monoblock phone experience).

It was a stroke of genius, really, but as is often the case with Google, stuff gets abandoned. Now, three years on, others are jumping back on it (and no doubt at least one of them will claim to have invented it)! A quick mention here for Microsoft too, with their Surface Duo and Surface Duo 2 - similarly abandoned, similar form factor (again, which we've had various examples of flying around PSC over the years). It's different in that it has two separate screens (apart from anything else) and it's not quite the passport size of the Pixel Fold - rather taller and wider, both closed and open.

Google did, however, maybe partly recognise all this by extending the support for the original Pixel Fold from three Android OS updates to five, meaning that it will now get Android 18 and security updates to June 2028 - making it more than a valid option to pursue in 2026. They also did the same for the Pixel Tablet, by the way and the other Tensor-powered phones, Pixel 6 and 7, to bridge the gap between all these and the newer Pixel 8 and 9. Unlike Microsoft - with the Surface Duo now dead in the water (at least for those concerned with Android security) - owners are left to try out various community-built alternative ROMs and software.


So, I think that's pretty much rounded up the background of how we got to here, mid-2026, in relation to these devices and particularly the Pixel Fold. It's a beautifully made device - my unit is in perfect condition, hasn't been used that much, screen crease perfectly intact, no knocks and bumps - one day, no doubt, if I keep it that way, a collector's item!

It's got Gorilla Glass Victus on the outside, front and back, a super-sturdy stainless steel hinge, and a body of high-strength aluminium. It uses a fluid friction system which allows for opening and holding at virtually any angle. The only real complaint about this is that, unless 'encouraged' with pressure, it doesn't quite open 'flat' at 180 degrees - rather, probably 179! But if you really want to, you can gently press it that last degree and it will stay there.

It feels really sturdy too, with beautifully designed curves around the edges for easy opening with fingers. They're rounded and lovely and smooth because of the metal frame. It feels 'cold' in the hand, too (if you don't case it), with all that metal - it really does feel like a class act, a premium experience all-round and an object of desire compared to the world of plastic-fantastic! There was a price for this, of course - in June 2023, on release, the 256GB version cost £1,749 and the 512GB unit was £1,869 - so you'd expect it to be well-built! The good news is that you can now pick up a good-condition second-hand unit (maybe not as pristine as mine, though) for certainly under £500, not far away from a quarter of the release price. If you can find one.

The tech specs on that outside screen are as follows: 139.7mm high x 79.5mm wide and, of course, a thickish 12.1mm fat! That's the trade-off. The two sides of this when clamped together are nothing like the thinness of 2026 book-style folders. Things have indeed moved on, and recent units coming out of the Far East are marvels of engineering with multiple silicon-carbon batteries too. So yes, it's a chunky monkey, as they say! But I'm OK with that. It has some heft - weight (283g in fact) - and you certainly know that it's in your front jeans pocket! But I'm OK with that too because, due to all the above, it sits very comfortably in the hand when closed, and I'm not alone in reporting that this is how I use the phone probably 90% of the time.

Another aspect of the physical phone that 2026 phones are finally 'getting there' with is ingress protection. Here, we do have very good water protection, but zero guarantees for dust at IPX8 - so not a phone to take to the beach or a dusty cellar! I guess that if you use this as a daily primary phone (and open/close it more than me), this could become an issue if great care is not taken. Anyway, back to that front screen. It's a bright and colourful enough (peaking out at 1,550 nits) OLED panel; 5.8", 1080p, that very different 17.4:9 ratio, 408ppi, and can refresh at 120Hz (for some content) if you choose.

There's a SIM card tray on the bottom leading edge which will take one physical card on my unit, but the phone does have eSIM support - all this for 5G, of course. Then there are microphones and antenna cut-outs around the frame, a speaker at each end (smartly designed - which we'll come to), a USB-C port, and a power button on the side which doubles as a capacitive fingerprint scanner above a volume rocker. Up top, there's that mmWave long-pill for America, as all units were built the same, it seems. The buttons feel very sturdy with no "play" or suggestion that they might not stay the course.

On the back, I've got a skin from those lovely people at XtremeSkins (please tell them we sent you). It's a lovely wooden colour (see image, above) and gives a little grip, so for those brave enough to run around without a case, it might prevent a drop! For those safety-conscious folks who do want a case, I can't speak more highly than the one that Noreve sent over (please tell them we sent you). They're not cheap like a soft, clear TPU from Amazon, but I reckon that this phone deserves more than that. And more than that you get with their ultra-premium gear. It really is lovely stuff. Here's my review of the gorgeous leather Saffiano variant in black. Treat yourself!

As you can see, the camera island runs across centrally - when the phone is closed, of course. The positioning of that, unlike the vast majority of other phones out there - including Google's more recent Fold phones (D'oh!) - allows the phone to be placed on a flat surface without wobbling. Seems like a no-brainer to me, but it seems phone OEMs think differently - perhaps assuming that all-encompassing cases will fix that (which they generally don't), or that nobody wants to do this with their phone. Bizarre. Anyway, this does - and slightly props up the top end with a gentle slope for a nice viewing angle. Underneath that skin is a flat piece of glass, as mentioned earlier, with a Google "G" in the middle. Smooth, classy, slippery and yes, vulnerable. Don't do it!

Talking of cases, another quick mention for one of the thinnest ones out there - the Latercase. It really is incredibly thin and made of that lovely aramid fibre stuff. Nice to the touch and yes, there's little sense in which you know it's on. The bad news is that having just had a look at their website, the one I have for my Pixel Fold seems to be no longer available. But I'm sure stock must be out there in retailers' cupboards, so worth a hunt. Latercases are not cheap, much like Noreve, but they really are superb options. Here's a snap of my dust-covered one! See what you can find.

Right - let's open it up! The inside screen is 7.6" in, as I say, landscape orientation, Still an OLED, but a kind of plastic one (so that it can fold). It refreshes at 120Hz if you want it to, again with some applications and peaks out at 1,450 nits in auto mode. The pixel layout is 1840 x 2208, returning a ppi of 378. The overall dimensions, when open, are 139.7mm high x 158.7mm wide and now, opened up, very thin at 5.8mm. There is, of course, a crease down the middle but honestly, even though newer screens that fold for 2026 devices have become all but 'invisible', I really don't consider this to be a problem. Yes, the finger can feel the hinge-ridge as it rolls over it and yes, if you hold the phone reflecting light at the right angle you can see it (and it looks significant if you do), but looking straight at it (as most people will, for most uses), you really don't see it.

Some people have had screen problems - early adopters who have used it day-in, day-out as their primary device, opening and closing it many, many times - but people like me who, as I said, are using the outside panel 90% of the time really produce minimal reports of problems, peeling, breakages or the like. Of course, you'll always find instances if you scour Reddit and the like for horror stories, but I contend that most are good. This one certainly is - though I don't know if the previous owner used it my way or the opposite, so it will remain a mystery!

What I will say, though, is that it's very, very glossy. Shiny and reflective for outdoor (particularly in direct sun) use. Very shiny and reflective! The plastic layer over the top of these folding screens has certainly, three years on, become less so - so yes, you'll get a better experience these days with more recent folding phones if you are an outdoorsy type who wants to open it up outdoors and not just use the outside display. And risk getting dust in the hinge. You get the message and idea! You've got to treat folding phones carefully (at least at this stage). They are not robust (yet) particularly, so really can't be chucked about or used as a football like a Nokia XR20! Take great care of it and it'll serve you well, is my motto. Don't give it to some spotty youth who doesn't care or value nice gear, living rather in a 'disposable' world!

There are also big bezels around the edges, which I'm OK with. It gives the fingers somewhere to hold it while not touching the screen. It seems to be the modern trend to have as little bezel as engineeringly possible, but there are pros and cons. There's a camera in the top-right serving as a selfie camera within that bezel, so not cutting into the display. When you close the phone up, it comes together with a reassuring 'clunk' (if you let it). So, that's about it for my observations on the physicality of the device. It feels and looks premium and, with that aforementioned heft, reassuringly solid and robust. I would suggest only opening it up in controlled environments to maximise the life expectancy, because I think you'll find the same as me - most of what you want to do can be done on that fabulously sized and shaped outside screen.

The Pixel Fold runs on a Google Tensor G2 (5nm) chipset. That feels a little aged now, and when I compare the operating speed against my Pixel 9, it's clear that the latter is ahead in terms of processing power with its Tensor G4 (4nm) two generations further on. But for me, and my use, apart from comparing the two in front of me running the same task and seeing that one is faster, in isolation, it really matters not if the Fold takes (usually) fractions of a second longer to open an app or download some data. When accessing Google's Circle to Search, Gemini app and other AI tools, I don't feel that there's any slowdown. Talking of which, there are some Pixel 9 exclusives missing on the Fold - like the Journal app and Pixel Screenshots - but not many. Gaming is not really my thing, but I have tested it with a fairly demanding car-racing game and all seems well. I detect no juddering or buffering and the phone doesn't seem to get hot. It's got the same 12GB of RAM to keep apps open in the background long enough and, away from the test bench, I really don't think people will see an issue.

The speakers on the phone are smartly arranged to make the most of the stereo soundstage whether the phone is closed, open, in landscape or portrait. So, closed up, the 'left' one is on the top edge of the front panel and the 'right' is on the bottom edge of the right panel. If you use it closed up in portrait, you get a similar sound experience to many monoblock phones, but turn it around into landscape and you get left- and right-firing speakers rather than having to deal with one of them coming out of the earpiece. Open it up in landscape, and the sound comes from left and right again, upwards- and downwards-firing - and in portrait, again, you get left and right. Smartly designed for any eventuality. And they sound great!

I get a lot of phones through my hands here, and I consider the sound from the Pixel Fold to be the best I've ever heard. My recently reviewed Motorola Signature comes close, but for me, the Fold holds the crown. Now, to be fair, I have not had every phone ever made through my hands, and Steve Litchfield does tell me that recent 'Max' iPhones are mighty impressive (with bass-octave shifting employed), but I've not heard that with my own ears, so I can't compare. I find the sound to be of very, very good quality here and mighty loud enough as tested with various apps, streaming services and high-res audio files I have available locally. Incidentally, you can check out Steve's coverage of the Pixel Fold in terms of YouTube Shorts (whilst distracted by the Microsoft Surface Duo!) over on his index in his Blog.

There's no 3.5mm audio-out port, of course, but Bluetooth v5.2 sounds fabulous - and for legacy ear/headphones, one can always use a dongle. Put one in your wallet/purse - assuming you still use one of those! I've tested all sorts of Bluetooth devices, speakers and headphones over the (now) years that I've had this phone - and as we have come to expect, the forward march of Bluetooth capability really is amazing. Here, also, it seems to have a good range and holds on well - though of course, your mileage may vary depending on the quality of the gear in use. Connectivity generally is very good, I have found over time. The 5G for voice and data works really well, with no drop-outs as a result of the phone; GPS locks me onto mapping and other apps that rely on it quickly and holds on well too. Wi-Fi 6e tested with half a dozen networks over time and, again, finds, locks and holds on well for good data (and voice with VoIP engaged). NFC works efficiently as I go about my business of paying in Tesco and also attaching other equipment that the system relies on. No complaints with all this connectivity stuff at all.

There's 256GB of storage on this unit, as I say, which I have always felt is enough - but if you get the chance of a 512GB version, more is always better, and I doubt it would cost that much more now. The trick would probably be finding one. I think fewer people actually bought the 512GB version anyway - some markets weren't even offered it - so yes, it might be a hunt! But for me, yes, and I didn't think I'd say this five years ago, but I do mostly stream stuff these days, and I have fabulous Wi-Fi and 5G where I live - and don't go many places! But yes, if you're a roving type, your mileage may vary again and you might rely on more storage. It's UFS 3.1, which seems to read/write very quickly in my tests.

In terms of physical security, there's a side-mounted capacitive fingerprint scanner as part of the power button which can be set for 'touch' or 'press'. I always use touch and have never had a problem with false attempts (which I did sometimes with Sony Xperia phones). The scanner works 100% of the time, first time, every time. They've used this, as with most folding phones - as to get it under screens is more of a technical challenge, I guess, and whatever state the 'fold' is in, it's always outward-facing and reliable. The only exception being that when I have the device in 'tent' mode consuming media, the fingerprint scanner (and indeed physical volume controls) are downward-facing - so likely on a desk. You have to pick the phone up to use them, or use on-screen controls for volume. But there are so many ways in which you can prop the device up, you can always find a way!

The USB-C port is v3.2 and it is, of course, OTG, but sadly there's no HDMI-out/DisplayPort capability, which means we lose out here on cabling up for Google's evolving/growing Desktop Mode (I shall have to use my Pixel 9 for that). Having said that, I'm not so sure that people really want that. DeX remains (though their PC software doesn't) and Motorola are going great guns with their Smart Connect (PC too), but I do wonder how many people beyond reviewers are using this. Especially when wireless connectivity is now so good with casting all over the place - in my tests, latency with casting video is at an all-time low; you'd hardly know that you aren't cabled up, to be honest.

The battery in the phone is a lithium-polymer unit rated at 4,821mAh. As the industry seems to be running away with battery sizes (out of the Far East) with the use of silicon-carbon, this does seem, in comparison, rather small. But actually, I don't find it so. I find that the phone lasts me a good day, with my average use, with 40–50% to spare. Of course, your mileage will vary because we all use our phones differently. As I have said, much of my use is on the outside screen, but actually, on testing, it does feel like even with the phone opened up, it performs not far off the same. It's a good battery and defies its size/capacity. There's also Qi wireless charging, but bear in mind that this is capped at 7.5W, so yes, very slow by today's standards. But on my cradle-charger by my bed, overnight - say seven hours - it has never failed to get me back up to 100% when I wake. I don't have any adaptive/saver modes on, for the record. Wired charging for those who need/use it is capped at 21W - so again, slow for 2026, but about an hour and a half or so will do it from a standing start. I guess that for most people this is OK, but there will be those heavy users who will want to carry a power bank and/or not be too far from a charging port.

I'm running the Android 17 QPR1 Beta 1 on my phone, so any references here to software will be based on that. Some of the features, if using the standard, official Android 16 stable build, may not be present - and may or may not make it to Android 17 stable. So, bear that in mind! I really like what Google have done with Material 3 Expressive. Some say that it's very Apple-like in many respects, but I don't see that. I dislike Apple's iPhone UI with a vengeance, but not what Pixel's Android has become. I can see where there is crossover and design-blending to some degree, but it feels to me like that's more in hardware design (flat rails and screens) on some monoblock models than this Pixel Fold. I'm sure that could be argued either way.

I like the chunky elements in the status bar up top. They are clear and bold, great font - just right. Even the battery icon, which, yes, is a blatant copy, has been done much better than most - big and clear with easily legible percentage figures inside it. I'd still rather have it without the icon behind it, but while it stays big like it is, I won't complain. I like what they have done with UI design throughout, including how the weather reporting looks, the icons, fonts and colours - it all works nicely - with one caveat: I like how the Always-on Display looks, including being able to change between various options via the lock screen menus. The caveat is that it's not bright enough. The only Always-on Display that I have found to be consistently bright enough for me is Motorola's - and then only on the Razr phones, Neos and now Signature. I find that the algorithms simply don't work for my eyes; they are always too dim unless I sit them right underneath a light source - and then, ironies of ironies, it's not needed!

I like how At a Glance now works with a background available (and even the option to turn the thing off completely if wanted). When I knew this was coming, I was convinced that I would turn it off, but actually, the background behind the row makes a huge difference - so much so that I keep it on. I'm not even too bothered by the ever-present Search Bar at the foot of the screen. I probably would remove that if I could, but it's OK for now. Not for me, but I see how interesting for some the new Theme Packs might be, to jazz up the home screen along with colours, contrast and even now different icon sizes, shapes and designs.

Home screens are laid out on the outside screen in the traditional Android way. Google's Discover feed to the left (if you want it), then pages 1, 2, 3, 4, and so on. If you use Pixel's launcher, these pages are replicated inside, exactly the same - with page 1 on the left and 2 on the right, then swipe left for page 3 on the left and 4 on the right on the 'next' pair of pages. It's all tied up together, as is font/display size, and can't be controlled independently. Sometimes I'm OK with this; other times I want more granular control, so I employ Octopi Launcher. This gives that - and oodles more. Completely different layouts for portrait, landscape, inside screen, outside screen - everything being considered independently. As you can imagine, it does take time to set up four different layouts, but once there, control is fine and independence rife. So, for tinkerers, this is my suggestion - though I'm sure there are plenty of options out there.

App layouts (aspect ratio) are largely sorted by now, in my experience. At first, many relied on developers to tweak their code to make their apps fill the spread of the two screens (but jump back to 'normal' when on just one side or the outside screen). Pixel had a tool to help people with that transition by telling the system how to lay non-compliant apps out, but pretty much all the apps I now use, three years on, don't need that. Developers and systems have learned that folding displays are here to stay, so it pays them to make apps look good. There are exceptions, but mostly it's good now. Lots of apps also have a specific 'landscape/tablet' layout being auto-detected by the system so, for example, they have menu bars down the left side instead of the bottom as soon as you open the phone up, switching over as if it's a tablet. Many of Google's own first-party apps do this, including Photos, News, Play Store and many more. YouTube Music (particularly in the Now Playing mode) lays out content beautifully, as does Google Maps, making use of the big canvas. Clearly, lots of thought has gone into app design by Google and others to make the folding phone experience a very good one, rather than the clunky mess that it was at the outset. Time has passed - another good reason to have waited until now for the technology to evolve instead of jumping in and early-adopting!

There are also multiple ways in which the phone can be used physically. In 'laptop' mode, you can use just the top half of the screen for one app and the bottom for another with split-screen. Or, in the likes of YouTube, run the video in the top half facing you and have the media controls 'on the flat' (the bottom half of the screen). Some apps are better coded than others to make use of this, so your mileage may vary. Then there's 'tent mode', as mentioned earlier, where you can make an inverted "V" of the device with the outside screen facing you, rolling screen-filling media. So, a small self-propped TV, effectively. Or leave it in that shape but turn it around so that the back of the phone is on a surface and the outside screen is looking back at you. Or open it up and turn it around for a slightly portrait orientation, which is great for surfing webpages. Or just roll the media content across the middle of the screen to maximise the size (clearly with black bars top and bottom to avoid stretching the video). There are so many ways to consume media and use the phone. A flexible feat - and I'm only just scraping the surface of possibilities here. It really is your Flexible Friend!

Then we have the oodles of ways in which Google's apps and services make their way into (particularly) Pixel devices (though many are universal across Android and beyond, of course). Adaptive brightness, sound, battery and more; Digital Wellbeing, safety and emergency options, security and passkeys support, storage control and options - almost everything under the bonnet has been reworked and more added, which would need a much deeper dive than this to pull apart! Discovery is the key, and learning what will work for you - or not. For example, just one of these I discovered delays notification alerts: adaptive battery! No thanks! You also have to be careful to check because some of these things are on by default, leaving the user scratching their head trying to work out why some knock-on impact has kicked in. Or not! Anyway, this is more about Android rather than this folding phone from 2023, so I shall leave all that and backtrack!

And so to cameras
. As you might know, digital photography is not really my thing. But I shall try with the help of Gemma, for completeness! While it’s easy to get caught up in the megapixels race of 2026, the original Pixel Fold’s triple-camera array remains remarkably capable. The 48MP f/1.7 main sensor was a workhorse at launch and even today, its 1/2" sensor size allows for decent light intake. It’s supported by a 10.8MP f/3.1 telephoto lens capable of 5x optical zoom and a 10.8MP f/2.2 wide-angle with a 121° field of view. On paper, these might look modest compared to the 100x AI zooms of modern flagships, but for the average user, having a dedicated 5x optical reach (112mm equivalent) is a huge win. It means your zoomed-in shots are actually capturing real detail through glass, not just cropping into a blurry digital mess.

Video performance on the OG Fold has aged gracefully, supporting 4K at 60fps and 10-bit HDR, which ensures that your home movies still look vibrant on modern displays. The selfie situation is where things get interesting - you have an 8MP f/2 inner camera and a 9.5MP f/2.2 camera outside, but the real secret weapon is the foldable design. By unfolding the phone and using the cover screen as a viewfinder, you can use that 48MP main sensor for selfies. In 2026, this Rear Camera Selfie mode still produces better results than almost any dedicated front-facing camera on the market, offering the kind of skin tones and detail that only a 'real' sensor can provide.

The real reason these cameras still feel relevant isn't the glass - it's the Google Tensor G2 and the years of software tuning that followed. Features like Laser AF (autofocus) and Dual Pixel PDAF ensure that the phone still snaps onto subjects quickly, while Google’s Night Sight has only become more efficient. Even if you aren't a photographer, you’ll appreciate how the OIS keeps your shaky-hand snaps clear. It’s a reliable, no-fuss system. It won't win a photography award in 2026, but it consistently delivers a sharp, well-exposed 12MP image (via pixel binning) that looks great in a digital gallery or on social media.

The UI is nice, too, with clear options, big and easy to hit, and a very good Night Sight mode in my testing, plus a good 'landscape' view when you open the phone up. On doing so, you're offered the aforementioned options as to how you want the cameras/folding to work: Standard Camera, Rear Camera Selfie, Dual Screen Preview or 'Made You Look' (showing one's presumably children or pets some cartoon images and sounds so as to make them smile or laugh)! There's also a bunch of other stuff like Astrophotography, dirty lens warning, audio zoom, frequent faces, Palm Timer and so on. Then there's all the stuff hooked into Google Photos like Magic Eraser and loads of other tools, but that's also a topic for another post! Loads of options and stuff to play with in the camera app, then - and actually, having never taken photography with tablets seriously, I can see that using the camera with the phone opened up might be fun and rewarding!

The original Pixel Fold is the rare piece of technology that feels more 'right' three years later than it did at launch, frankly! In a 2026 market saturated with tall, narrow monoblock foldables, the Fold’s passport form factor stands out as a triumph of ergonomic common sense. Its stubby, wide outer screen remains the gold standard for one-handed usability, while the landscape-first inner display offers a natural, tablet-like canvas that modern competitors are only now starting to replicate.

While the Tensor G2 and the chunky 283g chassis show their age against today’s featherweight, AI-optimised silicon-carbon wonders, the experience hasn't soured. Thanks to Google’s extended support, this device remains a software contemporary, running the latest Android builds with a level of fluidity that belies its 2023 origins. The cameras, though modest in raw specs, still deliver that reliable Pixel look through computational magic, and the speakers remain arguably the best in the business!

At a 2026 second-hand price of under £500, the OG Pixel Fold has transitioned from an experimental luxury to an incredible value proposition. It’s a beautifully built, premium object of desire that rewards those who treat it with care. If you can find a pristine unit, it’s more than just a functional tool - it’s a reminder that Google actually got it right the first time. For the Phones Show Chat crowd and enthusiasts alike, it remains a quintessential classic that’s still very much a daily-driver contender.

Saturday, 2 May 2026

Here Alone (2016)

This is a genuine slow-burn, low-budget, post-apocalyptic zombie film which was reportedly made for just $150,000. The entire film is set deep within isolated American woods - a setting director Rod Blackhurst has maximised using only half a dozen actors and a skeleton crew.

The story follows Ann, a woman surviving in the woods following the outbreak of a mysterious blood-borne pandemic that turns victims into feral cannibals. Ann survives by keeping her head down and masking her scent with a pungent mixture of mud and rotten food to evade the infected. She has quickly learned how to utilise the resources of the woods, abandoned houses and nearby water, following the instructions left by her husband before he died. As the story unfolds, we learn the fate of her husband, Jason, and baby daughter, Clara, via a series of flashbacks.

While minding her own business, she happens upon an injured man, Chris, and his step-daughter, Olivia, on an open road. After ensuring they are not infected, she brings them back to her camp - centred around her old family car, which we learn still has half a tank of fuel.

Initially, Ann is wary, suspecting they might take advantage of her - especially as Chris regains his health and begins questioning her about the car. However, a bond eventually forms between the two adults, sparking a jealousy in Olivia that comes to a head after Ann and Chris spend a night together. Chris attempts to convince Ann to travel with them, but they first need to secure food. They organise a raid on a local house, with the women grabbing supplies while Chris distracts the infected.

The film then hurtles towards a chaotic finale where we discover who survives and what the future might hold. While there aren't many scenes depicting the cannibals, the few that appear are well-executed, made-up, frightening and often violent. The creatures move in a long-established fashion - flailing arms and a staggering gait - but the portrayal never feels comic.

Ultimately, the film is less about monster-slaying action and more about the gruelling, repetitive reality of survival. This is depicted through long sequences where very little happens, capturing rather the experience of whiling away long nights in silence. It is a slow-burn, bleak and moving character study of three people pushed to their limits.

The actors deliver decent-enough performances, particularly Lucy Walters in the lead, who appears in almost every scene. She doesn't utter a word for the first third of the film - we simply tag along in her silence as she survives. The natural landscape provides a ready-made backdrop for the cinematography, with a focus on greys, greens and browns that evoke a sense of rot and stagnation. Replacing potential cheap jump-scares for atmospheric dread, the film places its emphasis on Ann’s haunting past. A subtle, impressive film that is now widely available on streaming.

Friday, 1 May 2026

TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra - A Guest Review by Gareth Williams

TCL - Call me when you get there!

First things first: thanks to Ted for the chance to spend the last few weeks playing with, testing, and evaluating two TCL NxtPaper phones - namely the 50 Pro and 60 Ultra. The former is a smaller unit and arrives without the branded smart folio case or pen included with the larger-screened latter.

Both have the TCL trick of paring back the phone to an e-ink-like experience, not only to maximise battery life but also to provide a streamlined, potentially more focused communication and usage experience. I was considering buying a TCL 70 Pro to fill a gap in my three-phone setup. I usually run with one flagship, one mid-ranger and an older flagship - depending on my particular whim - with one being camera-centric, one being my main do-it-all powerhouse and one for my sideline operations (small media/enterprise stuff that occasionally springs into life).

As things stand, I have a Pixel 10 Pro XL and a Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, and I flit between an older Samsung and a Huawei - so the "No. 3" phone slot is up for grabs! Back to the plot: there I was, contemplating the 70 Pro, when it was suggested I give these two a whirl prior to any final purchase decisions. How right that suggestion was!

I openly admit that I wanted to like the "e-ink" thing and was genuinely open to the TCL 70 Pro being my mid-range phone of choice; its higher storage capacity, smaller size and e-reader style were all of serious interest. However, as soon as I opened up the two NxtPaper phones and signed in to my various accounts, any thoughts of purchasing the 70 Pro evaporated!

From this point on, I only had eyes for the 60 Ultra. If you are looking at this series of phones and the TCL e-ink style setup, the pen and larger screen are a must. I feel it pertinent to state that I fully understand the so-called "e-ink" is not actually e-ink, but an effort to present something akin to that effect on an LCD screen (and it is effective). There is a degree of "horses for courses" here, with phone desirability being very much relative to the use-case.

With all that out of the way, here is what I think of the 60 Ultra from a usability stance, rather than bothering with benchmarks or spec-heavy analysis. I like it! I like the feel - yes, the feel - of the screen. The interaction with the surface is lovely and I like the fact that the pen setup is there, along with the folio case for protection and use as a stand.

Battery
Battery life (when utilising the ink modes) is very much "charge once and forget". I did this on a few occasions without any issues. I liked that.

Screen
Screen quality - in terms of overall visibility - is as good as you would expect. Again, the ink modes work well here and I do enjoy the tactile nature of interacting with it.

Sound
Audio is handled reasonably well. The speakers are certainly loud enough; however, a touch more depth would have been nice.

Cameras
The cameras are OK. The zoom range is acceptable and, in good light, they are fairly capable. There are enough modes to keep the average user happy, but there were some issues with fast focus and motion blur.

There are certainly far better "phone-shooters" out there, better-sounding phones and phones with better screens - and, of course, better-spec'd devices all-round. I think TCL clearly knows this, but - and this is a big "but" - there is just something about this phone. TCL has definitely hit on something with this ink-style system. It was enough to make me think twice - well, three or four times, actually - and I did consider adopting this one full-time. I was not alone, either; there were other admirers within my family!

I really like this phone. Did I say that already? Not as my No.1 device, or even my No.2, but as a device to keep for its positives, despite some definite issues. It feels nice, it looks nice and it is so very close to where it needs to be. And that is why I will be picking up a TCL - just not this one! My ideal TCL phone would have all the positives of this unit but with an AMOLED screen, a more comprehensive camera and a fully functional smart pen - all similar to the Samsung S24 Ultra.

On reflection, perhaps the S24 Ultra is the mid-range phone for me! Except it isn’t mid-range, and it doesn't have that "TCL magic" feel. I am wrestling with myself. I want this e-ink-like option and the "Max Ink" minimalist experience coupled with that lovely tactile screen interaction - especially for reading - but I want it as a layered option on a more premium phone.

TCL - I am enthralled by what you are doing. So much so, I am considering writing a separate piece advocating for your innovation, focusing solely on the genius switch on the side of these phones and the wonderful options the transition presents. You are almost there. Almost, but not quite. When you get there (assuming Samsung et al. don’t jump in and perfect this first), take my money!

PodHubUK Podcasts for the Month of April 2026

     

...a roundup of our month of podcasting. Links to the team, communities and podcast homes on the net at the foot, so scroll down!

Whatever Works
Episode 239 - The Gooseberry and the Fool!
Wednesday 1st April
Aidan and I are back again with an hour or so of fruity mayhem as we dig into all sorts of stuff - Whatever Works, and doesn't! This time we blow up balloons in microwave ovens, scatter toilet contents around the walls, hang out on our balcony railings perched on a pouffe, slice some salad, gorge Banoffee Pie with a thimbleful of custard and stacks more as always! So come on down into the gutter and join us!

Projector Room
Episode 207 - Tompopo Papaya
Wednesday 1st April

Gareth and I are back with another of our fortnightly roundups of what we've been watching. This time we gorge ourselves on Sweet Beans and Mrs Lovett's dubious pies, we catch the Pretty Lethal Red Plague down Hallow Road and even Project Hail Mary onto the odd Primate! There's lots of stuff Coming Soon and a moving Final Curtain too. Something for everyone, so do get stuck in!

The Camera Creations Podcast
Episode 18 - Question Time
Thursday 2nd April
The crew are back again to bring you an hour or so of thoughts, analysis and news from the world of photography and cameras. This time the panel takes some questions from listeners, has a look at our recent photos and soaks up some worrying Sony and AI-related news! All good stuff, now available in the usual places, so do join us!

The Tech Addicts 2026 Podcast
Sunday 5th April
Gareth and I are back with a smashing new season opener as we chat about how Nintendo sues Trump over Switch 2 battery, Xiaomi’s Sous-Vide Air Fryer, Google’s Whoop clone Fitbit, smart glasses for unsighted marathoners - and Evercade does widescreen retro gaming in style! Yay! Available now in the usual places, so do join us!

The Phones Show Chat Podcast
Episode 889 - A Pura Moto Flow!
Monday 6th April
Joe and I are here with an inbetweeny catchup show as we mop up all the items that have been shelved previously in favour of the much more interesting stuff from our guests. If you don't like Moto, you might want to hover over your FF Button! But it's not all Moto, by Jiminy no - news and chat on Sony, Honor, OnePlus, Poco and PSC Pub Meets amongst much more. Available now in the usual places, so do join us!

The Tech Addicts 2026 Podcast
Season 2, Episode 2 – A Tracker That Screams
Sunday 12th April
Gareth and I dive into Pebblebee’s new personal tracker which is an AirTag crossed with a safety siren and torch, unpack Amazon’s decision to “brick” classic devices, explore the sleek new Merak CD player from Fosi Audio, get the latest on RedMagic’s upcoming gaming tablet and round things up with a cyberpunk vinyl record player that glows like ambient light.

The Phones Show Chat Podcast
Episode 890 - Unbundling Bundey!
Monday 13th April
Joe and I are here with Ian this week and he lets us know what devices he's using at the moment, with some surprises! Photography with Intent is the sub-heading as he continues to enjoy his hobby with phones as well as cameras. We chat about that Pura device again (and a new one) whilst Joe has news about two Honor events this week that he's going to - neither of which involve footie! Loads more as always including Ian's Photo Picks of the Week. Enjoy!

Projector Room
Episode 208 - Thrash The Bride!
Wednesday 15th April

This time Gareth and I sink to the Bottom with Beers, shouting Cheers and feeling Ice Cold in Alex. We know Something Very Bad is Going to Happen with us Men Behaving Badly, inviting Strangers to Send Help - it only takes One False Move with Red Riding. Loads more, as always so do join us, now available in the usual places!

The Tech Addicts 2026 Podcast
Season 2, Episode 3 – Getting Google Off Phones
Sunday 19th April
Gareth and I dive into a packed lineup! We break down Motorola’s surprising alignment with GrapheneOS and what that means for privacy-focused Android users, alongside a quick explainer of the OS itself. From there, we look at VitaLink’s ambitious foldable device, cramming a 13-inch screen and keyboard into a single slab at a surprisingly low Kickstarter price and Audio-Technica’s eye-watering £1,700 AT-LPA2 turntable aimed squarely at audiophiles. We also explore Waveshare’s £150 handheld Linux machine that challenges the need for a traditional laptop, before shifting gears to Google’s crackdown on “back button hijacking” tactics used by some websites. Finally, we unpack the controversy around claims that Microsoft and LinkedIn have been “illegally searching” users’ computers, and what it could mean for trust in big tech. Plus the usual Bargain Basement goodies and more, so do join us!

The Phones Show Chat Podcast
Monday 20th April
Joe and I open the doors today for anyone who wanted to drop in. And by Jiminy, drop in they did! A great success with a number of our community's regulars all taking part and nattering with us about all things mobile phone. Seems like a very popular idea!

The Camera Creations Podcast
Episode 19 - Critical Evolution!
Thursday 23rd April
Chris, Ian and Charlie join me again this time as we have a discussion about the future of Camera Creations, how it's doing and where it might be better placed in our Group of Podcasts. Also implications for possible amalgamation of photos taken with phones here alongside PSC Photos. Eeek! When we'd done with that we headed for the theme of the show which was a critique on the photos sent in by the brave members of this group for evaluation. Thanks all for that!

The Tech Addicts 2026 Podcast
Sunday 26th April
Gareth and I were diving wrist-first into the sleek, premium vibes of the OnePlus Watch 4 Titanium, then switching gears to pure audiophile bliss with the Topping DX9 DAC to see if it really earns its bragging rights. We also explore a clever browser tool that might just expose whether you can actually hear the difference between FLAC and MP3 (brace yourself), before getting hands-on with the futuristic Turtle Beach MC7 wireless mouse. Yes, it’s got a touchscreen! Retro lovers, you’re eating good too, as SNK teases a modern take on the NeoGeo AES, blending nostalgia with new-school convenience. And finally, we round things out with Roberts’ latest portable radios, proving that classic listening still has a place in our always-online world!

Whatever Works
Episode 240 - I Suppose a Fork's Out of the Question?
Monday 27th April
Aidan and I are back after, yes, just 3 weeks! Keep the content coming and we may get back to fortnightly! Anyway, in a fun-packed show we have oodles of stuff to chuck about including a Faucet fixing, strapping into a harness, torches, screwdrivers, knives, mugs, butter dishes, armrest trays and loads more. Where else would you get a diverse mix of el clapo trapo?! Available now from the usual places, so do get stuck in, especially if you've not been offered a fork lately!

The Phones Show Chat Podcast
Episode 892 - Ultra Stargazing
Monday 27th April
Joe and I are joined by PSC first-timer David Burns so we take the opportunity to find out all about his IT background, device path and where he's ended up with mobile phones. Lots of Oppo, Honor, Apple and Moto chat in a Sidephone/BigMe sandwich! Loads more as always, so do join us again.

Projector Room
Episode 209 - The Apex Breeder
Wednesday 29th April

Gareth and I Carry On this time for much longer than 15 Minutes, way past our Point of Origin. We Thrash around again In the Blink of an Eye until the Apex has Vanished, en route to The Towering Inferno with that little Breeder, Fireman Sam! All good fun, loads more in Coming Soon too, but for now, get stuck in.


The Podcasts (PodHubUK)

Thursday, 23 April 2026

Motorola Edge 70

It often makes sense to compare a new phone down the line with the one it replaces or supersedes in Moto's sequence, but in this case, the Edge 70 looks and feels very different indeed to the Edge 60 which I reviewed here on my blog just short of a year ago now. Released as the X70 Air over in China, this is Moto's shot at the thin-is-in theme, here 5.9mm thin, which a number of OEMs are having a go at. So not so much of an annual evolution of the line as something very different and interesting.

It was released in October 2025 with an RRP in the UK of £699 (though at time of writing, that does come bundled with the fabulous Moto Watch Fit, Moto Buds Loop, a 68W Moto TurboCharger and even a Moto Tag - or £499 without the bundle). When you first take it out of the box it's strikingly thin! Which is the main USP here of course - beautifully sleek. Or as Moto say, "impossibly thin" - and strong too, made with "aircraft-grade aluminium" - light too at 159g, it's remarkably featherlight to hold and carry. Doesn't sound like it's going to break anytime soon and with IP68/IP69 alongside MIL-STD-810H certification, the Gorilla Glass 7i on the front makes for a reassuring package over the previous generation. Even if it is wafer thin!

Being wafer thin is maybe one reason why Moto has switched back to the no-edge Edge! Yes, it's a flat screen. And yes, maybe technically that was unavoidable but I really do think that the (slightly) 'edged' screen of my Signature (and other models, even down to the G86 which I reviewed here too) is classy and the quad-curve makes for lovely swipes from the edges, especially the bottom. Of course, you need a properly cut-out case to be able to make the most of that. But back to flat here, like the dinky Edge 60 Neo and Edge 50 Neo which I also reviewed here - so yes, maybe a size constraint with more room to move on bigger/thicker phones.

The thinnest other phone I have here in stock, I think, is the opened-up Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, though it's still 7.2mm 'fat' compared to the 5.9mm here on the Edge 70. But it's probably the closest I have for a comparison (now that the Motorola Z from 2016 with 5.2mm is long gone)! Anyway, before we get stuck in, let's do the obligatory unboxing! A slim white box with a SIM Tray Tool, USB-C to USB-C cable, papers and the same style hard plastic case with a Qi2 ring-magnet on the back as the Signature had for anyone who has any of those accessories to make use of it. It's a really nice case with cutouts all round rather than horrible button-covering soft plastic, but, like with the Signature's, it's very slippery. Also akin to the Signature's - once you get it on, you need a blowtorch to get it off again! Very firmly in place.

I'm not the first reviewer to have been loaned this Moto, so I'm not sure how many hands it's been through - but I can just about still detect the perfume smell in the box and on the device! This one is the Gadget Grey version and the back of the phone is kind of nylon-ish silicone. It's not 'cloth/fabric' like the Signature. I think I drew the short straw here with what seems to be the most boring, conservative colour as opposed to the other options, 
Lily Pad (light green), Bronze Green and Cloud Dancer, which sound much more Bohemian! Cloud Dancer seems to be the Special Edition one which has a creamy, textured cushion-like back with 14 inlaid Swarovski crystals and a silver logo! Fashion, eh!

So that's it for the unboxing and now to the device itself. I realise that it is technically 1mm thinner than my Signature, but it somehow doesn't really seem so in the hand (when both cased). I guess that if I didn't have a Signature here but rather another ordinary-sized 6.7" phone, it certainly would feel slim. It's certainly light at 159g and 159.9mm tall, 74mm wide and that 5.99mm thin. On the back, at the point of the camera island, it certainly isn't 5.9mm, so that figure relates to the rest of the device, obviously. The camera island carries the usual Moto design language these days with 4 circles looking symmetrical within that raised platform off to the top-left (in portrait) with shimmering blue classy-looking accents. There's a Moto 'M' logo in the middle of the back as branding and a Pantone badge bottom-centre depicting their colour, thus continuing the partnership.

The back of the phone slopes slightly into the chamfered (on both sides) aluminium frame around the phone, which has antenna cutouts and microphones around it and a kind of 'brushed' look (though not feel) to it. On the left we have the MotoAI button (which I'll come to), quite high up on the side and it matches the lenses on the back with that shimmering blue accent, which is very attractive (to offset this boring grey)! Up the top we have the Dolby Atmos branding, on the right a volume rocker and power button (but not accented in blue) and at the bottom, a SIM Card Tray with pokey-hole, centralised USB-C port and the 'right' speaker of the stereo pair, thus bottom-firing. The front is flat with a centralised Selfie camera up-top, just below the other speaker, the 'left', which is clearly front-firing and shared with the phone earpiece. 
In terms of ingress and robustness, like the Signature, the phone is rated IP68, IP69 and has the MIL-STD-810H certification. The front glass is also more robust than previous models, now Gorilla Glass 7i.

I think that I'm coming to like the wireless restore rather than cable these days. Good example here, using my Signature for the switch, the battery had been left all-but dead by the last reviewer (thank you team MOTOvator!) - whilst the wireless restore is going on I can be charging the battery as well. Yes, I know, it could be done with a cable and Qi Charging on a pad, but this seems better - and certainly faster - but we'll come to the battery stuff later. Talking of the Signature again, my primary phone and serious Moto flagship, it's going to be impossible not to compare this with that as, unlike the logical Edge 60 'upgrade' route, these two are wielding the same software throughput, coming in the same 'generation' - the Signature being, in all-but name, the Edge 70 Ultra - so big brother of this Edge 70.

The usual plethora of bloatware is present, sadly, on boot-up afresh, but thankfully all of these 'additions' can be uninstalled by those who don't want to use them or use other apps to do those jobs. 
Adobe Scan AI PDF Scanner - OCR, Opera Browser with VPN, TikTok, Booking dot com, Perplexity (though to be fair this is a part of the Moto suite these days with MotoAI so probably best not to uninstall it), Microsoft Copilot (ditto), Amazon Music (ditto), LinkedIn, Fitbit, Facebook, Instagram and a folder full of Games (which can be disabled so you don't have to see/use them if you don't want to). I guess that some will be interested in having these onboard, especially if they have accounts for them anyway, but I still think users should have the choice - and for a £699 phone, I don't think that the financial bung Moto get for this is justified. A £250 phone, yes, OK, but not in this bracket.

Android 16 is present out of the box and Motorola are promising 4 OS updates (so to Android 20) and Security Updates to October 2031 (so 5 years from release). This unit has 512GB storage and 12GB RAM (with the silly extender on top), which is just great, with UFS 3.1. The baseline model in some markets can be snagged with 256GB storage and 8 or 12GB RAM but I don't see that as an option here in the UK. There's no microSD Card support of course, but with these amounts of storage, I'd argue that 99% of users really won't need it. The international model here has a single nanoSIM slot on the tray and there is support for eSIM.

The 6.7" P-OLED flat screen is as lovely to look at, like most Moto phones these days. This one is 1220 x 2712, 20:9 aspect ratio and returns a ppi of 446, so good and sharp for those counting pixels (at least with human eyes)! It's bright, peaking out at 4,500 nits in auto mode and the right conditions and refreshes at 120Hz, so nice and smooth. We'll come to software later but while we're talking about the screen I must add my disappointment that there's no Always on Display here. Moto can do it - the ones on my Signature, Edge Neo phones, Razr phones are just perfect. (And it's possible to include it, as we know, even with LCD panels.) But they seem to shy away beyond these models. The LTPO is absent as a tick-box for the screen specs, so I can only guess that they are frightened of users complaining about battery drain. Maybe, in this case, with some justification, as it's not a huge one to fit into the slim chassis. But we'll come to battery later.

Not having an Always on Display drives me nuts, personally, and rules a phone out for me - but maybe you're a more balanced human being! For those like me out there, I do usually recommend some AoD Apps in the Play Store that I have tried with varying levels of features and success. AOA by newGen Mobile, AOD Flow by Androxus, XPath by aodlink.com and Peek AOD by Dubiaz are some usually on my shortlist, so check them out. Most have an acceptable hit on battery life and a good-enough feature set for free (or a time-trial) before deciding whether to risk the cost of a supportive coffee for the developers pluggin' away! Go on - support them!

Moto have moved away from MediaTek this year and used a SnapDragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) over the Edge 60's Dimensity 7300/400 (4 nm) depending on market. Neither reach the heights of the Signature's SnapDragon 8 Gen 5 but this is understandable I guess, given the price difference. The SnapDragon 7 Gen 4 is no slouch and is used in plenty of phones, especially from the likes of Xiaomi and the BBK Group - and even the just-announced Honor 600 range. It feels perfectly fine in terms of horsepower to me but yes, when directly comparing it on a test bench, against the Signature (and higher) one can see the slight difference in speed if you pick the right activities.

Further, I've tested the phone using my favourite Car Racing game (I'm no gamer but other reviewers tend to use Asphalt 9, so I follow suit) and I can see no juddering, buffering or anything of the like during gameplay. Seems perfectly smooth to me in fact. And updating a bunch of apps from the Play Store, copying loads of files with a cable into the USB-C port from my PC - it all works perfectly well, but, as usual, I'm probably not the most demanding of users and those pushing boundaries and limits might find some holes, as they might in pretty much any phone when driving to extremes, I'd guess!

My main concern was probably the battery at 4,800mAh, as I say, slimmed down for this body. Unlike last year's Edge 60 (5,200/5,500) it is a Silicon-Carbon battery, so I was interested to see how it competes, especially against the Signature's 5,200mAh Si-C as well. What it does do, much like last year's model, is charge at 68W with a Moto TurboPower charger and cable. Even with my generic UGreen 100W GaN charger and cable it doesn't do badly. But technically it should charge from flat to full in about 45 minutes (with the right gear). I find that even with a half-hour charge it's almost there, even without - so yes, very good and reliable. There's Qi Charging at 15W which is great for overnight trickling. Slow as it might be, so much better to have than to not! And then, for those who want to dabble with magnets and have some supporting gear, there's that case included with a 'ring' built into it. Unlike big brother Signature there's no reverse charging at all (but to be fair I'm not sure that I've ever used that outside of testing - I probably have the wrong lifestyle)! By the way, the Signature can charge at 90W so does leapfrog the Edge 70.

So now it's down to performance of said battery. It's clear that the standby time, screen-off, SIM Card in, connected to WiFi, is very good - as I reluctantly perhaps accept that the AoD might have taken a hit (though it certainly doesn't with, for example, the Edge 60 Neo)! Stretching the phone to its limits of all-day, average use (for me), I can get to a day and a half. All subjective of course, depending what you're using it for and how much you use it. Which is why I try to report on my 'average daily use'. But against other phones (with AoD on) it does do pretty well in fact, perhaps surprising given the slightly smaller battery, no doubt helped by the Si-C. Turning to my 10% Reading Test, screen-on, reading news, feeds, social media, but no video or music rolling, nor camera-use, it's good for over 2 hours, which is good-enough. Again, against other devices over the years I can form my own yardstick here. I test this between 100% and 90% and 50% and 40%. It's not up there with the 3-hour+ Moto 'Power' dubbed devices, but still much better than many I've tested. So yes, overall, I'm surprised and impressed at how well the battery performs, given the thin size. All of these figures are spookily similar to the Signature's, by the way - with its bigger screen, more power, leveling things out.

In terms of security and connectivity, there is an optical under-screen fingerprint scanner. This works well-enough in testing here and setup is fast and painless. It's not an UltraSonic like the Signature's (and there is a slight difference) but, yes, good-enough. Face Unlock is quick to set up and works flawlessly in my tests here. Coupled-up with lift-to-wake, a fingerprint is barely needed anyway. I've not been able to test 5G here (for various reasons about my situation) but I can report that it works well on 4G, fast and good connections for voice and data over cellular and VoIP also works, remember, over 4G as well! We have WiFi 6e which I have tested with 3 networks and can't fault it for connection, pick-up, hanging on and decent speeds. GPS seems to do the job nicely with various apps which rely on it. Locks on fast enough and holds on well. I've not been able to test NFC for Google Wallet payments but can report that it works fine and well connecting to other pieces of gear similarly capable and the range, connection and consistency seems to work very nicely with Bluetooth v5.4 here, tested with various headphones, earphones and other equipment.

I have written about Smart Connect before (and Ready For before it) and working with a PC this is where Moto leapfrogged Samsung's DeX by continuing to support Windows software. Install Smart Connect on Windows and you have a full Desktop computing environment driven by your phone. Now, one could argue that if you've got Windows in front of you and universal tools like Motorola's Phone Link, Google's Messages for Web and Quick Share, why do you need the Windows software (in terms of productivity and functionality). And this may have been the point that Samsung got to as they claimed few people were using their Windows software. But I like Smart Connect! Long may it live, I say! Inside this, we have a Messages portal, a Screen Share (whether Mirror or separate instance), using the phone as a webcam for webinars or whatever instead of the likely rubbish one in a laptop, creating a complete Mobile Desktop able to hijack the mouse and keyboard, using the phone as a Hotspot for getting connected, file management on the phone with hot-drag-drop, Cross Control to use other devices around the periphery of the PC with free-flowing mouse and keyboard hot-swapping between devices (like Second Screen for Windows), an echo of the photos on the phone, notifications, even app streaming - so run an app on the phone but control it on the PC - and loads more! It's a veritable playground of opportunity and I love it!

The stereo speakers. As I said earlier, the 'right' speaker is bottom-firing and 'left' uses the earpiece, so is front-firing. The software does a smart-enough job working that out and adjusting the output and soundstage to compensate but when comparing with the Signature's truly top-and-bottom-firing setup, there is a difference. The Signature just seems to be able to throw the sound out physically as well, making for a more immersive stereo experience. But I'm nit-picking now as this Edge 70 also sounds great in many ways.

The speakers are certainly loud-enough for most uses, though in terms of quality, bass, richness, they sit happier at about 80% volume. For those who want to push the limits however, there is the built-in Dolby Atmos to tinker with. As usual, when you do so, the payoff is usually a bit of volume loss - so the trick is to use that extra 20% volume at the top-end of the range to make things sound a little better, less trebly and thereby at 100% getting a better quality sound than it was at 80% volume, if you follow! The Signature's speakers' output is better in all these ways, but for most people, for most uses, the Edge 70 will be fine. And let's face it, none of these phones are going to please a real audiophile - and get nowhere near even the cheapest of stand-alone Bluetooth speakers. It's physics! So always a compromise.

As we have come to expect these days, the Bluetooth option with speakers or ear/headphones is the way to go, beyond casual listening - and we're rewarded! The technology seems to go forward in leaps and bounds and works beautifully with most capable equipment. I've tested it, as I say above, for range and quality and, of course, depending on the quality of connected gear, it sounds phenomenal. Far too loud for my ears, so I always have to turn volume down these days! I'm favouring Moto's own Buds Loop these days which I find work brilliantly well for me and my lifestyle, but also various ANC-capable headphones from various manufacturers and I find Bluetooth very hard to fault. Oh, there's no 3.5mm audio-out port here. I'm sure I should stop reporting that now and very few, certainly mid-range and above, now have this as Bluetooth storms on and batteries get better. Kudos to Sony, eh!

Just like the Signature (and now other Motos), the MotoAI button is on the left side, the correct side, not confusing the right side near to the power button. The button can be assigned actions for press-hold and double-press. Press and hold for MotoAI (or nothing), double-press for Update me, Take notes (or nothing). You can assign the power button on the other side for MotoAI if you like, or the usual power menu or (other) digital assistant (whatever your default is). On all of these there's now a slider for press-and-hold duration preference. You can also assign Android's own Quick Launch (so double-tap the back of the phone) to anything, pretty much, including (yet) another way into MotoAI - they want us to use it! I've written about MotoAI before and I think most of it is pretty much the same since I did, so do follow this link for a rundown of the features and how it all works.

In terms of Software, HelloUI, we continue to get all those good gesture functions with Moto of course, face unlock, lift to wake, 3-finger screenshot, chop-chop for torch, twist-twist for camera, sidebar with pop-outs, split-screen, pick up to silence, Attentive Display, fairly deep personalisation of fonts, icons, themes, colours, lock screen clocks, fingerprint animation, wallpaper and more. Long-press the home screen and enter a world of tweaks, personalisation, widgets and choices. It's just great to see someone continuing with the way things were, with only small adjustments for the better, not following the herd.

There is one enhancement over previous with the lock screen clocks, also present on the Signature, which used to give 3 options, but now there's 13 and each can be adjusted for font and colour as well. Moto continue their focus on privacy and security with a plethora of options, scans and adjustments. Secure folder, App lock, SIM lock, PIN pad scramble, scammer stuff, emergency alerts, eye protection stuff, Digital Wellbeing, various modes and so on. Some of this is Android's own with Android 16 but it's also clear that Moto have added their own suite as well and on top of that.

What I particularly like about the UI though, even with Android 16 onboard, is that Moto are not following the pack, like other sheep after Apple-like features. An annoying number of (particularly) Far-Eastern OEMs are including little features like Control Centres and dual drop-panels for Notifications, illegible battery percentage stuck inside a stupid little battery icon and a load more. Moto resist this and keep to their own design language which deserves huge kudos. Well done Moto. I do like some of what Google has done with Material 3 Expressive, particularly on Pixels, but it's clear from Moto's implementation of (especially) Android 16 that OEMs can go/keep going their own way if they want to. Hurrah!

The camera setup goes with 3 x 50MP shooters, the main one (f1.8 with OIS), the wide-angle (f2 with AF) and the Selfie (f2 with AF). The main camera can shoot 4K video at 60fps and the Selfie, at 30. There's no optical telephoto here but Moto do say that the main camera can offer "2 x lossless" zoom. The UI of the Camera app is much like other Moto units, looking suspiciously like an iPhone, with big, round, white shutter button at the foot and a side-scrolling Modes selector. For anyone having used a Moto in recent years, you'll be instantly at home as you jump between various features such as Night Vision (which, as usual seems to do a great job of pulling an image from situations that the human eye sees as pretty-much black!), Panorama, Ultra-Res (to use the full 50MP), Pro Mode for control of pretty much anything manually (except aperture of course), Portrait (which does have an "f" button, but control of aperture in this sense is all done in software of course), slow-mo - and via the main interface we have the 'Macro' button which uses the wide-angle's AF to get some close-ups. I've seen better, but it's good. Then there's a bunch of stuff in Settings for Watermarking, AI audio in video shooting, Palm Capture, Auto-Smile, assistive grid and 'spirit level' visuals, as I say, all good stuff - very Moto.

I've got some very nice shots from the camera in testing, as will, I think, all-but the most demanding of photographers using this phone. Digital photography, however, is not really my thing as you will know by now (give me film again)! So I'll do my usual trick of handing over to our friends at GSMArena for a breakdown, extensive testing and samples. Compromises need to be made to get this phone so thin of course, but given that limitation, they are pretty impressed in both good light and bad. I'll also jump back here in due course to add Joe Hickey's YouTube Video when he's done it, my Phones Show Chat colleague, on his channel. Not only for the camera stuff, but an overall review of the phone too. We'll also be offering more coverage and discussion on this, and other phones, Moto and beyond, in our PSC weekly podcast. Don't miss it!

I'm pleasantly surprised by this phone - and honestly, I didn't expect to be! The cameras are clearly very good, the battery certainly did a better job than I expected, as did the sound output given the amount of space inside to get it out, and decent. As always with Moto, the P-OLED screen is great, sitting on the front of a very-well protected shell in terms of IP-rating and beyond. As usual with Moto, the layer of HelloUI on top of Android is much better than most, conservative where it needs to be but with genuinely useful additions. I'm still not totally convinced by MotoAI, but it's nice to see them trying and moving things forward. These thin phones are always going to present a compromise, because they are thin, but for the right user, it feels like a class act and slips into the pocket very nicely. Oh, did I mention there's no Always on Display?! Come on Moto - if this was present, I could very well have bought one of these for myself!

For those who do want to buy, it's available in those four Pantone colours, Gadget Grey, Lily Pad, Bronze Green and Cloud Dancer with, as I say an RRP of £699. But as I finish this review, I still see it significantly cheaper (even, as above, £499 at MotoUK just now) which, to be totally honest, actually 'feels' like the 'right' price. The reason, clearly, that it's £699, is for Moto's hard work of cramming all this good stuff into a thin body. So if you're into the thin-is-in/Air thing, you'll no doubt be OK with the RRP. If not, I honestly think that you'd do better with a Signature for not too much more. And that's pretty thin too, you know! Whichever way you might jump, all these phones carry Moto's pedigree and style. If you like that, you'll love them!

Pixel Fold in 2026

There have been a couple of original-generation Pixel Fold units kicking about between various members of our Phones Show Chat community si...