Thursday, 7 August 2025

The King (2019) - A Guest Review by Chad Dixon

This film is a faux historical drama film currently on Netflix. Set in the early 15th Century, England is at a low ebb near the end of the reign of an extremely sick King Henry IV (Ben Mendelsohn). Sir Henry 'Hotspur' Percy (Tom Glynn-Carney), a former loyal knight but now distrustful of the ruler, has created a fraction between the nobles within court and threatens to bring civil war to the land.

Meanwhile the King is also trying to reconcile the broken relationship with his wayward eldest son Hal, The Prince of Wales (Timothée Chalamet). Disillusioned with the responsibilities of being the heir for some years now, he has been living as a drunken playboy amongst the poor folk of Eastcheap in a modest, wooden, two floor cottage with his friend - ex-military man and pseudo-father figure, John Falstaff (Joel Edgerton).

It comes to a head one day when Hal is summoned to court. He still has no interest in a direct parlé with his father but discovers that Percy Hotspur has amassed a substantial army on the borders of Wales to directly challenge the King's authority there. Knowing Hal's attitude to all things royal, initially Henry IV wishes to send his 2nd teenage son, Thomas (Dean-Charles Chapman), to confront Hotspur and cull the insurrection - but Hal insists that he must go with him.

On the battlefield, as the two forces face each other across a field, Hal pushes his way to the front, in a bid to override the authority of his commander, Thomas. He insists that if he challenges Percy directly, on a one on one fight to the death, this could stop the insurrection in its tracks and it will avoid mass bloodshed. Even though it did not look likely, Hal kills Percy but as a result, upstages his younger brother.

It's now a decade later. King Henry IV has finally succumbed to his mystery illness and his 2nd son Thomas is away in Scotland when the news of King's death reaches Hal. He cannot now avoid his responsibility of becoming the new King, Henry V. Within months, the interception of a French assassin to the crown reawakens a claim to the throne, by France, that was previously challenged by Edward III, the King's Great Grandfather. With the help of Falstaff, now a Knight, Hal leads the English army across the channel to face the Dauphin (Robert Pattinson), on a French field near the hamlet of Agincourt.

Just like some of Shakespeare's historical plays, this period drama is somewhat playing hard and loose with the accuracy of the events of the era. Similarly, the addition of the Bard's completely fictional Falstaff character, whose unpopular and unconventional military tactics seem to be the key to how the grossly-outnumbered English army approach the battle with the French knights on that field in 1415.

The 2 hour 20 minute runtime is often a slow build-up of scenes that are quite low-key or indoors in one-room locations, but they do build-up nicely towards the iconic Agincourt battle itself. Filmed on a modest budget of $23m, the battlefield action is quite epic. The viewer is brought right into the middle of the action, as it's filmed in close-up with countless fully armour-clad warriors and their broad swords gripped in a deadly melee in the mud. You can't really tell who is friend or foe!

Mendelsohn is unrecognisable as the barely-alive Henry IV and successfully sells the vulnerability of the throne. There's a devilishly machiavellian performance by Sean Harris as William Gascoigne, the King's Chief Justice and confidant, but it's Chalamet whose understated, slovenly delivery transcends the biggest character-arc here as the reluctant heir who eventually embraces his destiny - and ultimately becomes one of the most well known monarchs in English history.

Friday, 1 August 2025

Himizu (2011)

There was a big earthquake which hit northern Japan in March 2011 and this film's setting is in the aftermath of that as we scrabble about with the general population. In particular our interesting group of characters, as everyone tries to survive and rebuild their lives. In this case, a small group of people who have decided to clutch to each other by a lakeside.

The story is centred very much on two 14-year old teens, a male and female, both from horribly broken and abusive homes/families - where suicide and murder is never far from the minds of parents and kids alike. We witness much physical slapping, hatred and loathing - and even openness from parents regarding how they rue the day that the kids were born - and how much easier life would now be if they hadn't been. So as you can imagine, our two teens are fairly broken, despondent and pessimistic. Mozart's Requiem Mass plays frequently as the cameras meander over the physical destruction of the location and people too.

Keiko (the girl) is a little more positive than Sumida (the boy) and even though she's been abused at home too, tries to inject some optimism into him It's difficult though as his mum, who lives with him in the lakeside shack, brings home a trail of men to sleep with and neglects him (she eventually leaves) - and to make it worse, his dad regularly turns up drunk, looking for money, and often brutally and violently beats Sumida. Sumida's family (what's left of it) run a now-neglected lakeside pleasure boat hiring service, which he needs to take over, being the only one left, and make good. But he's not interested, enthused or motivated.

There's a kinda cute love angle going on here too though as Keiko has previously eyed-up Sumida at school (which he has now abandoned in order to run the boat business) and in the early stages of the film, hopes for a future with him. So she hangs around him, despite him rejecting her through is pessimistic misery and also sometimes physical abuse. She doesn't give up and tries to clean the business up, market it locally and get things going again. Meanwhile, Sumida is so fed up with beatings by his dad that he's considering drastic and fatal action. Both of our characters clearly, given the above, end up with lowly poor self-esteem as they feel rejected and unwanted by their parents.

In and around the boatyard/lake a group of other characters have landed and made tents and shacks of their own. This is where much quirky humour comes in as these characters interact and conflict often with the misery and gloom surrounding our main characters and their situation. To make things worse, they are all under threat, and suffer violence from, the local Yakuza mafia who keep turning up to get the money Sumida's dad owes them. By hook or by crook, taking no prisoners and casting the blame net widely.

Director Sion Sono seems to have specialised in making films about teenagers on the edge of society, often involving murder, crime and abuse - and this is clearly no exception. Apparently the story project started off with Manga roots before being adapted here for this outing. That's probably where I get lost on that stuff! Himizu means mole in Japanese and Keiko describes Sumida as such in the film, as he's often covered in mud in this rainy, dour setting, often after beatings and thrown into it.

I don't know any of the cast but top billing goes to Shôta Sometani and Fumi Nikaidô, the boy and girl. The two teens are terrific throughout and worth sitting through the fairly long 2 hours and 10 minute runtime for. The cinematography is compelling and engaging to watch as it leaps between all sorts of scenes of the bleak and depressing urban landscape, powerful horror and violence - and moving, touching adolescent romance.

The message here and reflection for the people of Japan following this tragedy is to be inspired, don't give up, gather up optimism from where you can and dream of a better future. A super film which I found hard to track down I'm afraid, snagging a used DVD in the end. The kind of film that will show on Channel 4 in the UK and the likes of MUBI - or even your local arthouse cinema. Watch out for it.

Maniac (1980) and Maniac (2012)

The 1980 cult classic Maniac, directed by William Lustig, and its 2012 remake, helmed by Franck Khalfoun and produced by Alexandre Aja, are two thematically linked but stylistically divergent films that explore the harrowing psyche of a serial killer. While both movies follow the story of Frank Zito, a deeply tormented individual who murders and scalps women, their approaches to the horror genre, character portrayal, and cinematic style are worlds apart. The original is a grimy, raw character study and a quintessential piece of grindhouse cinema, whereas the remake is a sleek, stylized, and immersive psychological thriller that leverages modern filmmaking techniques to terrifying effect.

Joe Spinell's Frank Zito in the 1980 film is a physically imposing, sweaty, and unhinged man who haunts the dirty streets of a crime-ridden New York City. The film is shot from a traditional third-person perspective, giving the viewer a voyeuristic and deeply uncomfortable look into his repulsive life and horrific crimes. Spinell, a veteran character actor who also co-wrote the script, delivers a performance that feels less like a polished act and more like a visceral, unbridled descent into madness.

His sheer physicality and unsettling demeanor make him feel like a real monster, the kind you might actually encounter in the darkest corners of a city. The film's low-budget aesthetic, brutal practical effects by master Tom Savini and the authentically grimy setting of Times Square contribute to its reputation as a disturbing, mean-spirited piece of exploitation horror. It is a product of its time, capturing the urban decay and genuine terror of a city on the edge, with a jarring score by Jay Chattaway that heightens the sense of dread and unease.


The 2012 remake, in stark contrast, is a polished and modern re-imagining. Its most significant and defining departure is its near-exclusive use of a first-person point-of-view (POV) perspective. We see the world literally through Frank's eyes, and his face, played by the seemingly innocent Elijah Wood, only appears in reflections or brief "out of body" moments during his most psychotic breaks. This masterful stylistic choice forces a deeply unsettling identification with the killer, making the audience a reluctant accomplice to his atrocities.

Wood's portrayal is less of a hulking monster and more of a fragile, broken man whose handsome, approachable exterior is a cruel disguise for his inner turmoil. His casting subverts expectations and adds a layer of terror - this Frank is the person you might befriend, a soft-spoken individual with a hidden darkness. The shift from New York to a neon-drenched Los Angeles and the pulsating synth-wave score by "Rob" give the film a polished, almost beautiful quality that stands in stark contrast to its sickening violence. This juxtaposition of beauty and brutality is a key element of its unique horror.

Both films delve into Frank's "mommy issues" as the root cause of his psychosis, but they handle the theme with different levels of ambiguity and intensity. The original provides vague glimpses of physical and verbal abuse, leaving much to the audience's imagination and Spinell's unhinged monologues. The remake, however, makes this trauma more explicit, showing hallucinatory flashbacks of his mother, a prostitute, and her neglectful behaviour. This makes the remake's Frank seem more consciously tortured and conflicted, even trying to fight his compulsions. In both versions, Frank's obsession with mannequins is a twisted attempt to recreate and control the women he cannot have. But the remake's POV cinematography makes this obsession feel more personal and claustrophobic, as we are trapped inside the killer's mind as he meticulously staples scalps to his lifeless creations.

A crucial difference lies in the character of Anna, the photographer who becomes entangled with Frank. In both films, she represents a potential for redemption, a chance for Frank to forge a normal connection. However, the original's Frank is a purely monstrous force, and his relationship with Anna is a brief, false hope that is brutally extinguished. The remake's Frank, in his fragile state, genuinely seems to yearn for a normal life with Anna, and his eventual descent into targeting her feels more tragic and inevitable.

Ultimately, the choice between the two films comes down to a preference for a particular style of horror. The 1980 Maniac is a shocking, visceral experience that puts a repulsive character on full display in an ugly, unforgiving world. The 2012 version, in contrast, is a more sophisticated and intellectual film that uses clever filmmaking techniques to force an uncomfortable and unforgettable psychological experience on the viewer. Both are masterpieces in their own right, and both are equally horrifying in their unflinching portrayal of one man's madness. (Reviewed with the assistance of Gemini.)

The Veil (2024) - A Guest Review by Adrian Brain

This TV Series, currently on Channel 4 in the UK,
is the latest creation from Steven Knight (Peaky Blinders, SAS:Rogue Heroes and the forthcoming Bond). It is about a British secret agent, codename Imogen, working on behalf of the French secret service, who is dispatched to verify the identity of a high-level female ISIS operative, Adilah, who may know the details of a large terrorist plot.

Unlike many of Knight’s previous offerings, this isn’t a high-octane thriller with lots of violence, but more of a 'road movie' character-study between the lead actresses, who are absolutely mesmeric. Imogen is played by Elisabeth Moss (The Handmaid’s Tale) and is charismatic as ever.

Adilah, played by Yumna Marwan, who I've not seen before, is easily her match. The interplay between them is fantastic as each misleads the other, whilst also unveiling truths - but what is the truth and what is fabrication?

There is comic relief in the form of incompetent and arrogant French and US Secret Service agents, constantly getting into fisticuffs - and some wonderful scenery on view as the plot moves from Syria to Istanbul, Paris and London. There is some violence (Imogen turns out to be pretty handy with a bollard in her hands) but it isn’t at the level of Peaky Blinders and the like.

This had me thoroughly engrossed in the characters and plot over the six episodes. Yes, it does fall apart in the last episode when Imogen catches up with her past (watch out for that red dress - strikingly self-indulgent) and Knight yet again demonstrates he rarely knows how to elegantly close a story off, so overall, the ride was better than the destination. Not perfect, but well worth a look if you like this sort of slow-burn drama.

PodHubUK Podcasts for the Month of July 2025

 ...a roundup of our month of podcasting. Links to the team, communities and podcast homes on the net at the foot, so scroll down!

The Phones Show Chat Podcast
Episode 861 - Slick Clicks Tricks!
Saturday 5th July
Another of our world-famous two-headers this week as Steve and I unpack all sorts of goodies. The Nothing Phone 3, Jolla japes, Edge and Razr antics with Clicks Keyboard, iPhone battery replacing, Xiaomi 15 Ultra - the one-trick-pony (but what a trick!), adding an assistant on phones for voice-only with oodles more - and Steve even learns what M3E stands for!

Projector Room
Episode 189 - Drag the Net
Wednesday 10th July

Gareth, Allan and I natter about film, cinema and TV as usual. This time we get stuck into Nine Puzzles while Four Mothers pop up 28 Years Later, we slaughter Tales from the Lodge in Sweet Virginia while Rose spends The Longest Day on Everest. Loads more as always, so do join us.

The Phones Show Chat Podcast
Saturday 12th July
Steve and I are duckin' the heat again this time by recording before breakfast(!) to bring you our weekly thoughts on all things phone. We Unpack the new Galaxy devices, x-ray Xperias, talk location tracking and even safety with powerbanks. Steve catches us up on the Surface Duo/Android 16 and iPhone news while I dive into early thoughts on the Oppo Find X8 Pro. Loads more as always, so do join us.

The Camera Creations Podcast (at Whatever Works)
Episode 2 - Pilot 2 of 2
Thursday 17th July
Joe Hickey, Chris Kelly, Ian Bundey and I dip our toes into the water of podcasting about all things camera and photography for a second time. It's still a bit of a getting-to-know-you pod as we chat about what we expect from it, introductions and throw ideas around. It's published on the back of Whatever Works so you'll find it in Podcatchers under that feed (for now).

The Phones Show Chat Podcast
Episode 863 - Find the Duo Open!
Sunday 20th July
Mike Warner joins Steve and I this week and he dives deep into the Xiaomi 15 Ultra with Photography Kit, Surface Duo ROMs and Elder-friendly UIs. Steve explores Doro and KaiOS for the T9 experience and I roundup my coverage of the Oppo Find X8 Pro. Lots more of course, so do join us.

Whatever Works
Episode 229 - Chicory Tip Chips!
Tuesday 22nd July

Aidan and I are here again with a headline (well it should have been) Camp Coffee Taste Test! With an Iced Coffee one thrown in for good measure. Loads more stuff as always to waste an hour of your time as we leap from Ninja HandBrakes to Polymorph Salt of the Earth and oodles in between. Do join us so as to wipe that miserable frown and furrowed brow off your tedious world-shattered faces if nothing else. And bring a beer. For me!

Projector Room
Episode 190 - A 2001 K-PAX Oddity
Wednesday 23rd July

Gareth, Allan and I are here again to catch up on a bunch of stuff happening in film, cinema and TV for your audio delight! We're Dazed and Confused - but not on Speed, grab ourselves a Cliffhanger with Superman, apply a Scanner Darkly to Heads of State and fit loads more in Before Sunrise! So do join us.

The Phones Show Chat Podcast
Saturday 26th July
Steve and I welcome Shane Craig back to natter about almost exclusively folding Android phones, as you'd imagine. Samsung, Oppo, OnePlus, Pixel and so on. Steve also highlights the changes in iOS26 for the Apple faithful.

The Camera Creations Podcast (at Whatever Works)
Episode 3 - Phones vs Cameras
Thursday 31st July
Joe Hickey, Chris Clayton, Ian Bundey and I bring you another bunch of thoughts about all things cameras and photography. We pick up some device-release news, chew over thoughts about the way forward for the pod and finish up with a discussion comparing photos shot with cameras vs phones.


The Podcasts

Wednesday, 30 July 2025

Avengers: Infinity War (2018) - A Guest Review by Chad Dixon

I saw this for only the second time recently as it played for the first time on UK Terrestrial TV over the last weekend. (Still a shame Marvel's Thor: Ragnarok hasn't been on terrestrial TV yet as it's the direct prequel in the MCU's Infinity Stones saga.) 
Some may be having Superhero film fatigue and wouldn't look twice at something like this, but while it's available on the BBC's iPlayer for a limited time, I think it's definitely worth another look - as there's a lot here to unpack.

Since the dawn of time, six special stones with their own unique powers were created in the Big Bang and legends say that whomever wields all six could complete any wish with just a snap of their fingers. Following the lore of the Marvel comics, throughout millennia, the Infinity Stones have now found their way to the Milky Way Galaxy. In the previous 18 films, the MCU has been following their journeys as various characters have possessed them individually for periods of time. The Avengers have been part of these journeys and have been aware of what their arch enemy, the mighty Thanos' was planning. With the help of his specially created gauntlet, he is to claim all the Infinity Stones and complete his chosen quest to save this Universe of limited resources by culling half of its entire population of living things.

I think we are virtually at peak MCU here and there's nothing that's been released in the last few years that comes close to how much is packed into this 2 hour 29 minute epic. Just about every Earthbound superhero and all of the Guardians of the Galaxy are involved in this story. The very well choreographed action sequences are nicely paced near the start, containing handfuls of protagonists in a few, around the Galaxy locations. All those threads come together nicely as they build to a final all-out battle scene back on Earth on Wakandan soil.

Directed by Anthony and Joe Russo, they do a brilliant job of keeping the myriad aspects and threads that make up this gripping story together. The effects are top-notch. With multiple space scenes, spaceships, alien planets and countless CGI and motion-capture characters all seamlessly intermingled with the real actors. The well written script is concise so neither exposition nor action outstay their welcome on-screen.

One particular performance stands out as almost Shakespearian in delivery and that's Josh Brolin as Thanos. Hidden entirely behind his seven and a half foot purple-skinned motion-captured facade throughout, he totally brings all of his thespian powers to the role - and even though he is the main antagonist, you sort of can't wait till he's on-screen again. Everyone else does a stirling job and keeps you focused on the multi-stringed plot - but there's far too many to mention by name here. You can easy look them all up on IMDb. If you have a decent-sized TV at home with a good sound system, or even if you don't, go and get that bucket of your favourite popcorn and enjoy a cinematic spectacle!

Monday, 28 July 2025

Fantastic Four: First Steps (2025) - A Guest Review by Chad Dixon

This is the fourth film that's been released since 2005 containing the iconic Marvel superhero team and the second reboot. This time it's to bring them under the official MCU umbrella and further consolidate all the major characters in one studio. Directed by Matt Shakman, known previously for his TV work on WandaVision (2021) and for a couple of episodes of Game of Thrones in S7, this is biggest project to date.

Labelled as Earth-828, (an alternate universe) we are in a retro-futuristic 1960's New York City. Dispensing with another full origin setup in this version, the long-time space exploration team are already fully established with their unique powers being in full public knowledge. As the Fantastic Four, they are well-respected by the people and city officials alike. Their home and base is the Baxter Building - a super-tall skyscraper in the centre of the city. And that's where the story begins.

We first see Sue Storm (Vanessa Kirby) in her bathroom looking directly at a positive pregnancy test. She immediately shows it to her husband, Reed Richards (Pedro Pascal). They embrace and bring the amazing news to the remaining members of the quartet in the lounge - her younger brother, Johnny Storm (Joseph Quinn) and the massive rock-like being, Ben Grimm (Ebon Moss-Bachrach), who are both equally delighted for the pending new arrival and can't wait to be uncles.

It's months later now and Reed, who is the main scientist of the group, is currently working on teleportation experiments. He's found success and shows Johnny as he transmits an egg four meters across the lab, intact. This is a big thing! Later that evening, all four are on the open-air balcony, high up on their building, when the siren alert sounds on all their team wristbands at once. A disturbance in the sky, but it's not massive weather system. Something otherworldly is arriving from Space!

The group mobilise in their flying car and head directly to Times Square, which Richards has worked out to be the focus of the disturbance. A massive crowd has already gathered there as the entity floats slowly down to hover over the square. It's a female human figure on a surfboard but totally coated in silver. She speaks and states that she is just the herald and has come to announce the fate of Earth - which has been chosen to be the latest planet consumed by the one called Galactus.

Obviously, this a redo of the story first brought to us in Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer (2007). Shalla-Bal (Julia Garner), who was already an established Marvel Comics character as the platinum-coated herald is a distinct change but works as well here. The much bigger budget here has not only expanded on the overall aesthetic, but it's given us a more authentic representation of the super-giant Galactus, perfectly played and voiced by the deep bass tones of Ralph Ineson.

Those aesthetics were a big part of the much more substantial feel to this Fantastic Four big screen outing, but although I still have a bit of a soft spot for that 2007 cast, I think this new cast embodies their roles well, as there's some interesting chemistry. The addition of baby as a potential future member was an intriguing prospect. There was quite a bit of scientific MacGuffin thrown into the plot but even though there was a couple of "Huh!" moments, it was easy to follow.

The final act was well choreographed as all the iconic superpowers worked well together, but the ending was a bit telegraphed and wasn't much of a surprise. Also, it came quicker than expected in this surprisingly short 1 hour and 55 minutes runtime. This film is the start of Phase Six of the MCU's latest big story arc and I'm already looking forward to seeing this team in action again. Stay for both the mid and post credit scenes.

The King (2019) - A Guest Review by Chad Dixon

This film is a faux historical drama film currently on Netflix. Set in the early 15th Century, England is at a low ebb near the end of the r...